ICNIRP, guidelines, conflicts of interest and EU

Two members of the EU Parliament, Claus Buchner and Michèle Rivasi, published on June 19, 2020 a document on ICNIRP. It shows the many conflicts of interest that exist among the ICNIRP members.

It clearly also shows that the ICNIRP guidelines should not be used for radiofrequency radiation. At pages 48-49 this is concluded:

We think that the call for more independent scientific assessment in this area is, for all the arguments mentioned above and in what follows, fully justified. 49 That is the most important conclusion of this report: for really independent scientific advice we cannot rely on ICNIRP. The European Commission and national governments, from countries like Germany, should stop funding ICNIRP. It is high time that the European Commission creates a new, public and fully independent advisory council on non-ionizing radiation. The funds currently allocated to ICNIRP could be used to set up this new organisation. And given the overall rise in R&D funding via Horizon Europe, with a foreseen budget (for 2021-2027) of between 75 and 100 billion euros, funding should in no way constitute an insurmountable hurdle to setting up this new, truly independent, body.”


3 thoughts on “ICNIRP, guidelines, conflicts of interest and EU

  1. Pingback: חברי הפרלמנט האירופי - ניגוד עניינים בגוף הקובע תקנים לקרינה בלתי מייננת - ללא קרינה בשבילך

  2. Thank you for this post!
    ICNIRP should ad an “i’ to its name, ICNIRIP , to mark that it is the “International Committee for Non Ionising Radiation INDUSTRY protection. I hope this body will be shamly dismantle.

  3. Pingback: Sécurité de la 5G : complots et conflits d’intérêts – Maison du 21e siècle – Le Magazine de la Maison Saine

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s